You don’t have any Active Subscription.
Subscribed with another email? Logout and Login with that one.
Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription
Weather News November 8, 2026 e-Paper
The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.
First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.
Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.
Science For All The weekly newsletter from science writers takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in!
Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers
THEdge At the cutting edge of education and careers
Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there
Gender Agenda Stories from beyond the binary.
The Hindu On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.
Updated - August 16, 2026 06:57 pm IST - Colombo
Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake. File
The Sri Lankan government will table a contentious Bill in Parliament this week seeking to raise the mandatory retirement age of judges of the country’s Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, a move critics say could undermine the independence of the judiciary.
According to a media statement issued by Minister of Justice Harshana Nanayakkara, the government will table the proposed constitutional amendment Bill — the 22nd Amendment — on Tuesday (August 18, 2026). It seeks to amend Article 107(5) of the Constitution to raise the retirement age of Supreme Court judges from 65 to 67 years and that of Court of Appeal judges from 63 to 65 years.
The Anura Kumara Dissanayake administration has sought to justify the move by saying it would help address the massive backlog of cases, expedite court proceedings, and ensure continuity by retaining experienced and senior judges. The amendment would help address a backlog of approximately 1.1 million pending cases, Mr. Nanayakkara, an Attorney-at-law, told the media.
However, the political Opposition, members of the legal fraternity and sections of civil society are fiercely opposing the move, arguing that it would impact the independence of the judiciary.
In a social media post, leader of the Opposition Sajith Premadasa questioned why the extension [of the retirement age] must apply to sitting judges.
Amid the ongoing debate largely confined to Sri Lanka’s legal fraternity and sections of civil society, a 20-member delegation of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL), a professional body of lawyers, met President Dissanayake on August 12.
“The BASL emphasised that the proposed amendment would have a serious impact on the independence of the Judiciary and that, in the circumstances, the proposed amendment should not be proceeded with. The BASL further pointed out that there are several other urgent matters requiring the attention of the Government which must be given priority,” the association said in a statement following the meeting.
The President’s office said Mr. Dissanayake “stressed that the decision to extend the retirement age of judges was not taken with any individual or group in mind, but in the broader public interest.” He further emphasised that this amendment represents only one component of a broader reform programme aimed at addressing issues across the entire judicial system, the Presidential Media Division said in a statement following the meeting.
Responding to the developments, Margaret Satterthwaite, U.N. Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, recently wrote to the government and noted that the amendment, in the form reportedly proposed and in its implications, “may not be in line with international human rights standards related to the independence of the judiciary and the right to a fair trial, including: the separation of powers, the ability of judges to perform their functions free from undue influence, pressure or interference, and the public’s confidence in the judiciary’s independence”.
Published - August 16, 2026 05:52 pm IST
Copyright© 2026, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
Terms & conditions | Institutional Subscriber
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.
Loading comments…