About Us Advertise Careers Contact Us Privacy Policy Community Guidelines
Locating… 13°C English WhatsApp Alerts Email Alerts
BREAKING NEWS
Centurions De Silva and Mendis flay inexperienced Pakistan attack to boost Sri Lanka in 1st test - FOX Sports Fire Damage Delays Installation of Simulated Lunar Greenhouse in Germany APOD: 2026 November 11 – NGC 4449: Small Galaxy, Big Impact Water Surges Into Navajo Reservoir Isaacman lays out SLS path to the 2030s NASA Invites Media, Public to Join Voyager 1 One-Light Day Activities NASA to Welcome Expedition 74 Astronauts Home at Space Center Houston Horizon Microtechnologies Targets Constellation-Scale Production As Esa Phi-Lab Selection Strengthens Industrialisation Push Sri Lanka launches pilot of Chinese flying taxi service - Yahoo Israeli Tourist Pushes Sri Lankan Tour Guide Into Sea, Video Sparks Outrage - NDTV
SRI LANKA NEWS

‘Gehenu Lamai’ in Sri Lanka - The Morning

Lanka Hit News • Oct 5, 2025 · 1y ago • 5 min read
Share:

‘Gehenu Lamai’ in Sri Lanka The Morning

After what seems to have been an eternity, it was refreshing to hear a Prime Minister who knew what they were talking about and who they were talking to. On 26 September, Prime Minister Harini Amarasuriya was the Chief Guest at the Sri Lanka premiere of the 4K restoration of ‘Gehenu Lamai.’

Reflecting on the film, Amarasuriya noted its director Sumitra Peries as a trendsetter and a trailblazer. She went on to add that she was more than a director, arguing that she broadened our understanding of feminism in South Asia.

I thought the tribute was well articulated, because it touched on three points that scholars of Sinhala cinema have missed out. The first is that Sumitra’s ascent as a film director followed a trajectory that was very different to all her contemporaries, bar none, in Sri Lanka and South Asia.

Unlike the other distinguished figures of women’s filmmaking in the region, Sumitra was educated in the West as an editor and found employment in Sri Lanka as an editor and an assistant director. In this, as I noted in my tribute to Sumitra after her passing in 2023, she became a precursor to the likes of Mira Nair.

The second is that in her choice of source text for her first film, she deliberately overlooked the conventional choices of the day. When Lester Peries selected ‘Golu Hadawatha’ as the first of three films he made for Ceylon Theatres in 1968, Karunasena Jayalath tended to be viewed negatively by the country’s critical establishment.

One of Sumitra’s overarching achievements – which almost no biographer or critic has commented on – was her ability to transform the most mundane, sentimental texts into living works of art. Jayalath’s novels resonated well with popular readers, and in Sumitra’s hands, ‘Gehenu Lamai’ became more than just a teenage romance, instead becoming a morality tale of class and love.

The third point is Sumitra’s ability to even out the political and popular aspects of the story. Watching ‘Gehenu Lamai’ on the big screen, I was struck by some of the scenes that were suffused – there is no other word for it – by a feminine sensibility.

Note the very first sequence between Kusum, played by Vasanthi Chathurani, and Padmini, played by Shyama Ananda. British filmmaker Mark Cousins, with whom I spoke about Sumitra, said that she “probed shyness and tentative love” well.

That sequence with these two girls mingling with each other, which ends with another classmate describing Padmini as “almost Kusum’s partner,” showed how Sumitra was able to delve into a world and an experience – in a word, girl-girl friendships – which, as Prime Minister Amarasuriya noted in her speech, “none of her contemporaries could”.

When the film was screened in Mannheim, Germany, one critic commented on its “aura of pessimism” and its “unobtrusive photography”. Reflecting on the review with me – I think somewhere back in 2016 or 2017, when I had deep conversations with her – Sumitra noted that she had to restrain herself from being obtrusive with the camera.

You see this tension throughout ‘Gehenu Lamai’; it crops up in some of her other films as well, prominently ‘Ganga Addara,’ where sequences that otherwise add very little value to the narrative – like the protagonist’s wedding – go on endlessly. Sumitra herself admitted that she had a tendency to “prettify everything”. But as Cousins has noted, this only added layers and layers of depth to her work.

What distinguishes ‘Gehenu Lamai’ from ‘Ganga Addara’ – the latter had the luxury of a rich producer and all the time and freedom Sumitra wanted – is how essentially innocent the former is. The latter is a bolder and more expressive work: emotions are not kept back, they gush out in torrents, sometimes in hysterics.

In ‘Gehenu Lamai,’ only the audience is privy to Kusum’s inner thoughts: almost no other character – except Padmini – pays much attention to what she is thinking and feeling.

When Nimal’s mother, played by Chitra Wakishta (who also played Dhammi’s mother, incidentally, in ‘Golu Hadawatha’), discovers Kusum’s affair and reproves her for it, Kusum cries by a tree. When Nimal’s mother comes back with a cup of tea and notices the tears, all she can say is, “How can you go on the road looking like that? Here, wipe those off.”

‘There are faults, and they do not matter’

Ultimately, ‘Gehenu Lamai’ became to Sumitra’s career what ‘Rekava’ was to Lester’s, ‘Ahas Gauwa’ to Dharmasena Pathiraja’s, and ‘Palangetiyo’ to Vasantha Obeyesekere’s. When you compare these debut works with their later films, you notice a rawness of style and vision, a somewhat jagged edge, which you don’t in their later years.

Commenting on ‘Ahas Gauwa,’ Regi Siriwardena noted its “inevitable technical roughnesses”. It’s like what Randall Jarrell wrote of Walt Whitman’s poetry: “[t]here are faults in this passage, and they do not matter”. Pauline Kael wrote the same of some of Brian De Palma’s early films.

I think this is applicable to ‘Gehenu Lamai’ as well. There is a certain slowness in the second half, especially in those scenes at the school, which might disarm younger audiences today. The dialogues, most of which I believe were taken from Jayalath’s novel, have a sentimental and highfalutin quality that only Jayalath was capable of.

Yet ultimately, they do not matter. There is a wider social and political relevance in the narrative, which I feel transcends these limitations. I can do no more than quote the rest of Jarrell’s judgement on Whitman’s poetry; in his words, I think, we can find a true and honest reading of Sumitra’s film.

“The serious truth, the complete realisation of these last lines, make us remember that few poets have shown more of the tears of things, and the joy of things, and of the reality beneath either tears or joy.”

(The writer is an independent researcher, writer, and columnist whose work spans art, culture, history, and foreign policy. He is working on a study of Martin Wickramasinghe and an oral autobiography of Sri Lankan director Sumitra Peries. Both are slated for publication in 2026. He can be reached at udakdev1@gmail.com)

(The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the official position of this publication)

The Morning is Sri Lanka’s foremost national news brand, delivering timely insights across politics, current affairs, sport, and entertainment. Stay informed with The Sunday Morning, The Daily Morning, and The Morning Online.

Developed by Derana Macroentertainment (Pvt) Ltd.

Copyright ©2023 Liberty Publishers (Pvt) Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Join the Conversation